Climbing the “Mount Improbable” of Richard Dawkin’s explanation for the accumulation of small, incrementally beneficial steps fails to recognize that a totally free and random system built on chance alone will not go straight up the gradual backside slope of the mountain toward an optimum end-point destination, but may also …according to unguided random chance…regress backwards or sideways down the slope in an endlessly undirected series of futile “wrong turns” in science referred to as “junk.”
That the hundreds of billions of different plants, trees, bacteria, fungi, insects, fish, birds, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals would all reach the level of functionality, survivability, and adaptability in a balanced worldwide ecosystem…is more akin to an intelligently designed worldwide air-traffic control system or a well-run, big city train station…than to some random chance assemblage of complex parts that somehow…without foresight…lock into place (accumulate) beneficial variations for future use.
If the atheistic philosophy of naturalism is true then someone might reasonably ask: “what is wrong with the material particles” to produce such a contrary reality of evil and suffering in the world?
All of the breadth and depth of reality, good and bad, does not originate from physical matter. The creative artistry of Chopin’s Ballade No. 2 does not derive from the statics and mechanics of the length of the piano keys, the density hardness of the felt hammers, and the physical tension of the strings.
Our commonsense judgment can step in at some point and transcendently insist that logic, reason, and artistic creativity are not determined by material particles.
Post-modern relativism renders the viewpoints of everyone equally suspect, including the philosophy of naturalism. Materialism, at its extreme end-point in trying to reduce human intelligence and communication to an explanation solely based upon the properties of material particles alone, dissolves itself.
If our thinking, reasoning, and judgments are based upon the material particles in our heads alone, then what differentiates the value of one opinion over another opinion? What differentiates the value of the information content of a four-year old sitting at the piano banging out random noise without pattern or melody, and the 10-year old playing a Chopin prelude at her first music recital?
The same charge that atheists and agnostics rail at the biblical God today regarding the inexplicable presence of evil and suffering in the world turns back upon themselves in having to explain the presence of morally deficient, faulty particles in the solely materialistic scheme of naturalism.