An analogy to an Olympics track meet might be helpful. In the Olympics track meet competition, one event…the mile-relay…has four runners each running one lap around the track…receiving the baton from the previous runner and passing the baton to the succeeding runner…to complete a continuous and unbroken four-lap circuit around the track.
But this relay baton is not passed off to the other distinct and unconnected events outside of the mile-relay. The baton is not passed to the high-jumpers, pole-vaulters, high-hurdlers, 100-meter sprinters, or the competitors in the shot-put or javelin throw…thereby creating an unnatural, artificial, and unwanted connection between these disparate events. These other events are discontinuous and unconnected to each other and to the mile-relay, even though they are all a common part of the Olympics track meet.
A network schedule of logic-lines connecting the start-times for each track and field event…simplified into printed program schedules for the spectators…would have to be created ahead of time to organize the track meet. But these organizational lines connecting the start and finish times head-to-tail would never be confused with the fundamental differences between pole-vaulting, high-jumping, the long-jump, the triple-jump, and the 5,000-meter run. The essential characteristic of each distinct event creates a discontinuous gap between each event that is unbridgeable in terms of mixing and blending…other than their logical sequencing for time and spacing within the overall management of the track meet competition.
The passing of the baton between all of the track and field events to create an artificial connection…a connection that does not logically exist…simply because at a general level all these events belong to the same track meet…would be non-sensical.
To attempt to blend and mix all of these disparate track and field events together into a connected whole through small, incremental, transitional phases using the relay baton as the connecting link…would be a forced arrangement falling so far outside of the intentionally designed, fundamental discontinuity gaps between each of the individual events of an athletic track meet…as to render the entire competition gradualistically indecipherable and thus incomprehensible.
If all of the track meet events were blended together in infinitesimally small incremental steps…it would be difficult to determine when and where one event finished and another started.
Each track and field event also has a predetermined goal…an outcome…that entails a different “lifestyle habit” program of training and technique. Even though running hurdles, the pure sprints, and the long-distance running events share similarities, they are vastly different in their “lifestyle habits” of length of distance, agility requirements, pure speed, endurance, time-span, and the physical characteristics of the competitors. Specified function…running fast, leaping high, jumping far…are inseparably connected to the lifestyle habits unique to each athletic event.
Common descent must, by definition, have the relay batons at each branching node of the expanding tree of life…safely passed from one species to the next without falling to the ground (becoming extinct).
But fitness in “lifestyle habits” in each track meet event does not carry over into fitness in lifestyle habits in another event. The Olympic gold medalist in the high-jump cannot pass along gold metal proficiency to the pole-vaulter simply by handing off a relay baton. The gold metal “lifestyle habit” proficiencies in each event are too different and discontinuous to be connected by the unrelated, inadequate element of a relay baton.